What is the safest distance from the 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

safe distance to live from cell phone tower  (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.



While it sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances.  https://anotepad.com/notes/3fix9ib9  is also the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.