If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. safe distance from cell tower is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a cell tower shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.