If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For https://etextpad.com/ , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.