If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. https://www.openlearning.com/u/greenvilstrup-rtp7qg/blog/WhatLengthsShouldIKeepFromThe5GCellPhoneTower is the most important organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.